Factors associated with reported service use for mental health problems by residents of rural and remote communities: cross-sectional findings from a baseline survey

David Perkins, Jeffrey Fuller, Brian Kelly, Terry Lewin, Michael Fitzgerald, Clare Colemen, Kerry Inder, John Allen, Dinesh Arya, Russell Roberts, Richard Buss

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    28 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: The patterns of health service use by rural and remote residents are poorly understood and under-represented in national surveys. This paper examines professional and non-professional service use for mental health problems in rural and remote communities in Australia. Methods. A stratified random sample of adults was drawn from non-metropolitan regions of New South Wales, Australia as part of a longitudinal population-based cohort. One-quarter (27.7%) of the respondents were from remote or very remote regions. The socio-demographic, health status and service utilization (professional and non-professional) characteristics of 2150 community dwelling residents are described. Hierarchical logistic regressions were used to identify cross-sectional associations between socio-demographic, health status and professional and non-professional health service utilization variables. Results: The overall rate of professional contacts for mental health problems during the previous 12 months (17%) in this rural population exceeded the national rate (11.9%). Rates for psychologists and psychiatrists were similar but rates for GPs were higher (12% vs. 8.1%). Non-professional contact rates were 12%. Higher levels of help seeking were associated with the absence of a partner, poorer finances, severity of mental health problems, and higher levels of adversity. Remoteness was associated with lower utilization of non-professional support. A Provisional Service Need Index was devised, and it demonstrated a broad dose-response relationship between severity of mental health problems and the likelihood of seeking any professional or non-professional help. Nevertheless, 47% of those with estimated high service need had no contact with professional services. Conclusions: An examination of self-reported patterns of professional and non-professional service use for mental health problems in a rural community cohort revealed relatively higher rates of general practitioner attendance for such problems compared with data from metropolitan centres. Using a measure of Provisional Service Need those with greater needs were more likely to access specialist services, even in remote regions, although a substantial proportion of those with the highest service need sought no professional help. Geographic and financial barriers to service use were identified and perception of service adequacy was relatively low, especially among those with the highest levels of distress and greatest adversity.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number157
    Pages (from-to)157
    Number of pages13
    JournalBMC Health Services Research
    Volume13
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Keywords

    • Health service utilisation
    • Mental health
    • Rural health

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Factors associated with reported service use for mental health problems by residents of rural and remote communities: cross-sectional findings from a baseline survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this