Feasibility of Machine Learning and Logistic Regression Algorithms to Predict Outcome in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery

Jacobien H.F. Oosterhoff, Benjamin Y. Gravesteijn, Aditya V. Karhade, Ruurd L. Jaarsma, Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs, David Ring, Joseph H. Schwab, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Job N. Doornberg, Machine Learning Consortium, Anne Eva Bulstra, David Langerhuizen, David Sanders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background:Statistical models using machine learning (ML) have the potential for more accurate estimates of the probability of binary events than logistic regression. The present study used existing data sets from large musculoskeletal trauma trials to address the following study questions: (1) Do ML models produce better probability estimates than logistic regression models? (2) Are ML models influenced by different variables than logistic regression models?Methods:We created ML and logistic regression models that estimated the probability of a specific fracture (posterior malleolar involvement in distal spiral tibial shaft and ankle fractures, scaphoid fracture, and distal radial fracture) or adverse event (subsequent surgery [after distal biceps repair or tibial shaft fracture], surgical site infection, and postoperative delirium) using 9 data sets from published musculoskeletal trauma studies. Each data set was split into training (80%) and test (20%) subsets. Fivefold cross-validation of the training set was used to develop the ML models. The best-performing model was then assessed in the independent testing data. Performance was assessed by (1) discrimination (c-statistic), (2) calibration (slope and intercept), and (3) overall performance (Brier score).Results:The mean c-statistic was 0.01 higher for the logistic regression models compared with the best ML models for each data set (range, -0.01 to 0.06). There were fewer variables strongly associated with variation in the ML models, and many were dissimilar from those in the logistic regression models.Conclusions:The observation that ML models produce probability estimates comparable with logistic regression models for binary events in musculoskeletal trauma suggests that their benefit may be limited in this context.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)544-551
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume
Volume104
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Mar 2022

Keywords

  • Machine learning
  • logistic regression models
  • musculoskeletal trauma
  • Orthopaedics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Feasibility of Machine Learning and Logistic Regression Algorithms to Predict Outcome in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this