Financial mechanisms to improve the supply of ecosystem services from privately-owned Australian native forests

Ian Ferguson, Laura Levetan, Neville D. Crossman, Lauren T. Bennett

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Much of Australia's native forest is privately-owned and is needing investment to maintain and improve the supply of a wide range of ecosystem services. This paper reviews mechanisms presently used in Australia to improve the supply of ecosystem services, with particular emphasis on financial mechanisms. Auction, green bond and biobanking schemes are widely and, so far, successfully used in a number of States, especially in projects where the actions required and ecosystem services can be readily measured. Measurement of biodiversity and biodiversity-based services remains problematic, despite some fairly widespread application of different measurement systems. Inadequate or variable measurement systems could engender a loss of investor interest if equivalence or gains cannot be appropriately verified. A new Biodiversity Investment Scheme is proposed, based on the structure used commercially in Managed Investment Schemes. The choice of mechanism, however, will be mainly determined by landowner attitudes to assignment of property rights, and by scale, the extent of public versus private consumption goods, and the transaction costs and risks.

Original languageEnglish
Article number34
Number of pages22
JournalForests
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Feb 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Auctions
  • Bio-banking
  • Biodiversity
  • Ecosystem services
  • Green bonds
  • Managed investment schemes
  • Property rights
  • Public consumption goods
  • Risks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Financial mechanisms to improve the supply of ecosystem services from privately-owned Australian native forests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this