TY - JOUR
T1 - Fit for purpose. Co-production of complex behavioural interventions. A practical guide and exemplar of co-producing a telehealth-delivered exercise intervention for people with stroke
AU - Ramage, Emily R.
AU - Burke, Meredith
AU - Galloway, Margaret
AU - Graham, Ian D.
AU - Janssen, Heidi
AU - Marsden, Dianne L.
AU - Patterson, Amanda J.
AU - Pollack, Michael
AU - Said, Catherine M.
AU - Lynch, Elizabeth A.
AU - English, Coralie
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: Careful development of interventions using principles of co-production is now recognized as an important step for clinical trial development, but practical guidance on how to do this in practice is lacking. This paper aims (1) provide practical guidance for researchers to co-produce interventions ready for clinical trial by describing the 4-stage process we followed, the challenges experienced and practical tips for researchers wanting to co-produce an intervention for a clinical trial; (2) describe, as an exemplar, the development of our intervention package. Method: We used an Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) approach to co-produce a telehealth-delivered exercise program for people with stroke. The 4-stage process comprised of (1) a start-up planning phase with the co-production team. (2) Content development with knowledge user informants. (3) Design of an intervention protocol. (4) Protocol refinement. Results and reflections: The four stages of intervention development involved an 11-member co-production team and 32 knowledge user informants. Challenges faced included balancing conflicting demands of different knowledge user informant groups, achieving shared power and collaborative decision making, and optimising knowledge user input. Components incorporated into the telehealth-delivered exercise program through working with knowledge user informants included: increased training for intervention therapists; increased options to tailor the intervention to participant’s needs and preferences; and re-naming of the program. Key practical tips include ways to minimise the power differential between researchers and consumers, and ensure adequate preparation of the co-production team. Conclusion: Careful planning and a structured process can facilitate co-production of complex interventions ready for clinical trial. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
AB - Background: Careful development of interventions using principles of co-production is now recognized as an important step for clinical trial development, but practical guidance on how to do this in practice is lacking. This paper aims (1) provide practical guidance for researchers to co-produce interventions ready for clinical trial by describing the 4-stage process we followed, the challenges experienced and practical tips for researchers wanting to co-produce an intervention for a clinical trial; (2) describe, as an exemplar, the development of our intervention package. Method: We used an Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) approach to co-produce a telehealth-delivered exercise program for people with stroke. The 4-stage process comprised of (1) a start-up planning phase with the co-production team. (2) Content development with knowledge user informants. (3) Design of an intervention protocol. (4) Protocol refinement. Results and reflections: The four stages of intervention development involved an 11-member co-production team and 32 knowledge user informants. Challenges faced included balancing conflicting demands of different knowledge user informant groups, achieving shared power and collaborative decision making, and optimising knowledge user input. Components incorporated into the telehealth-delivered exercise program through working with knowledge user informants included: increased training for intervention therapists; increased options to tailor the intervention to participant’s needs and preferences; and re-naming of the program. Key practical tips include ways to minimise the power differential between researchers and consumers, and ensure adequate preparation of the co-production team. Conclusion: Careful planning and a structured process can facilitate co-production of complex interventions ready for clinical trial. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
KW - Co-design
KW - Co-production
KW - Integrated knowledge translation
KW - Intervention development
KW - Research design
KW - Research partnership
KW - Stakeholder participation
KW - Stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122306751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1138515
U2 - 10.1186/s12961-021-00790-2
DO - 10.1186/s12961-021-00790-2
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85122306751
SN - 1478-4505
VL - 20
JO - Health Research Policy and Systems
JF - Health Research Policy and Systems
IS - 1
M1 - 2
ER -