Foucault's 'Critique' of Neoliberalism: Rawls and the Genealogy of Public Reason

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Foucault devotes seven out of the twelve lectures he delivered at the Collège de France in 1979 to German and American neo-liberalism. Contrary to the widespread view that the purpose of these lectures was to 'critique' neoliberalism, I sketch another reading of those lectures that connects them with a different kind of critique of liberal political reason that we find in the work of John Rawls. I begin by showing that Foucault is more normative than is often realised: at one point he raises the question 'what form of governmentality would be appropriate to socialism?' I then show that Rawls is not simply normative but also descriptive of the institutions and policies of liberal government: his argument for property owning democracy as an alternative to welfare state capitalism is one element of a conception of governmentality associated with his conception of justice as fairness. Finally, I point to some of the ways in which Rawls's conception of the kind of government and economy compatible with his principles of justice was influenced by elements of postwar neoliberalism. I conclude by suggesting that Foucault's sketch of a genealogy of neoliberal economic and political thought points to a historical conception of Rawls's idea of public reason, and that the egalitarian tradition of neoliberal thought on which Rawls draws points toward possible answers to Foucault's question about a governmentality appropriate to socialism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-51
Number of pages13
JournalNew Formations
Issue number80-81
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes


  • Foucault, Michel, 1926-1984.
  • Rawls, John, 1921-2002.
  • Neoliberalism
  • Normativity
  • Governmentality
  • Egalitarianism
  • Public reason


Dive into the research topics of 'Foucault's 'Critique' of Neoliberalism: Rawls and the Genealogy of Public Reason'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this