TY - JOUR
T1 - Fracture risk assessment by the FRAX model
AU - McCloskey, E. V.
AU - Harvey, N. C.
AU - Johansson, H.
AU - Lorentzon, M.
AU - Liu, E.
AU - Vandenput, L.
AU - Leslie, W. D.
AU - Kanis, J. A.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The introduction of the FRAX algorithms has facilitated the assessment of fracture risk on the basis of fracture probability. FRAX integrates the influence of several well-validated risk factors for fracture with or without the use of bone mineral density. Since age-specific rates of fracture and death differ across the world, FRAX models are calibrated with regard to the epidemiology of hip fracture (preferably from national sources) and mortality (usually United Nations sources). Models are currently available for 73 nations or territories covering more than 80% of the world population. FRAX has been incorporated into more than 80 guidelines worldwide, although the nature of this application has been heterogeneous. The limitations of FRAX have been extensively reviewed. Arithmetic procedures have been proposed in order to address some of these limitations, which can be applied to conventional FRAX estimates to accommodate knowledge of dose exposure to glucocorticoids, concurrent data on lumbar spine bone mineral density, information on trabecular bone score, hip axis length, falls history, type 2 diabetes, immigration status and recency of prior fracture.
AB - The introduction of the FRAX algorithms has facilitated the assessment of fracture risk on the basis of fracture probability. FRAX integrates the influence of several well-validated risk factors for fracture with or without the use of bone mineral density. Since age-specific rates of fracture and death differ across the world, FRAX models are calibrated with regard to the epidemiology of hip fracture (preferably from national sources) and mortality (usually United Nations sources). Models are currently available for 73 nations or territories covering more than 80% of the world population. FRAX has been incorporated into more than 80 guidelines worldwide, although the nature of this application has been heterogeneous. The limitations of FRAX have been extensively reviewed. Arithmetic procedures have been proposed in order to address some of these limitations, which can be applied to conventional FRAX estimates to accommodate knowledge of dose exposure to glucocorticoids, concurrent data on lumbar spine bone mineral density, information on trabecular bone score, hip axis length, falls history, type 2 diabetes, immigration status and recency of prior fracture.
KW - clinical risk factors
KW - fracture probability
KW - FRAX
KW - intervention thresholds
KW - risk assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111637771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13697137.2021.1945027
DO - 10.1080/13697137.2021.1945027
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85111637771
VL - 25
SP - 22
EP - 28
JO - Climacteric
JF - Climacteric
SN - 1369-7137
IS - 1
ER -