Abstract
Objective: To determine the prevalence of frailty and associated factors in the North West Adelaide Health Study (2004–2006) using the Frailty Phenotype (FP) and Frailty Index (FI).
Methods: Frailty was measured in 909 community-dwelling participants aged ≥65 years using the FP and FI.
Results: The FP classified 18% of participants as frail and the FI 48%. The measures were strongly correlated (r = 0.76, P < 0.001) and had a kappa agreement of 0.38 for frailty classification, with 37% of participants classified as non-frail by the FP being classified as frail by the FI. Being older, a current smoker, and having multimorbidity and polypharmacy were associated with higher frailty levels by both tools. Female, low income, obesity and living alone were associated with the FI.
Conclusion: Frailty prevalence was higher when assessed using the FI. Socioeconomic factors and other health determinants contribute to higher frailty levels.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 120-126 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Australasian Journal on Ageing |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Australia
- cohort studies
- epidemiologic measurements
- frail older adults
- prevalence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Frailty prevalence and factors associated with the Frailty Phenotype and Frailty Index: Findings from the North West Adelaide Health Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver