Full title: Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s Megafauna

Corey J.A. Bradshaw, Christopher N. Johnson, John Llewelyn, Vera Weisbecker, Giovanni Strona, Frédérik Saltré

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The causes of Sahul’s megafauna extinctions remain uncertain, although several interacting factors were likely responsible. To examine the relative support for hypotheses regarding plausible ecological mechanisms underlying these extinctions, we constructed the first stochastic, age-structured models for 13 extinct megafauna species from five functional/taxonomic groups, as well as eight extant species within these groups for comparison. Perturbing specific demographic rates individually, we tested which species were more demographically susceptible to extinction, and then compared these relative sensitivities to the fossil-derived extinction chronology. Our models show that the macropodiformes were the least demographically susceptible to extinction, followed by carnivores, monotremes, vombatiform herbivores, and large birds. Five of the eight extant species were as or more susceptible than the extinct species. There was no clear relationship between extinction susceptibility and the extinction chronology for any perturbation scenario, while body mass and generation length explained much of the variation in relative risk. Our results reveal that the actual mechanisms leading to the observed extinction chronology were unlikely related to variation in demographic susceptibility per se, but were possibly driven instead by finer-scale variation in climate change and/or human prey choice and relative hunting success.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere63870
Number of pages43
JournaleLife
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Carnivores
  • Extinction
  • Flightless birds
  • Macropodiformes
  • Vombatiformes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Full title: Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s Megafauna'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this