Abstract
This commentary responds to Aarseth et al.'s (in press) criticisms that the ICD-11 Gaming Disorder proposal would result in "moral panics around the harm of video gaming" and "the treatment of abundant false-positive cases." The ICD-11 Gaming Disorder avoids potential "overpathologizing" with its explicit reference to functional impairment caused by gaming and therefore improves upon a number of flawed previous approaches to identifying cases with suspected gaming-related harms. We contend that moral panics are more likely to occur and be exacerbated by misinformation and lack of understanding, rather than proceed from having a clear diagnostic system.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 285-289 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Behavioral Addictions |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are creditedKeywords
- Diagnosis
- Functional impairment
- Gaming disorder
- ICD-11
- IGD
- Internet gaming disorder
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Functional impairment matters in the screening and diagnosis of gaming disorder: Commentary on: Scholars’ open debate paper on the World Health Organization ICD-11 Gaming Disorder proposal (Aarseth et al.)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver