TY - JOUR
T1 - Gemcitabine and carboplatin in carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) in elderly patients: Analysis of a phase 2 Adelaide Cancer Trials and Education Collaborative (ACTEC) study
AU - Bishnoi, Sarwan
AU - Pittman, K
AU - Yeend, S
AU - Brown, M
AU - Koczwara, Bogda
AU - Kotasek, D
AU - Patterson, W
AU - Townsend, A
AU - Luke, C
AU - Price, Timothy
PY - 2011/10
Y1 - 2011/10
N2 -
Objective: Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) remains a significant oncological problem for the elderly. Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment but the ideal regimen remains uncertain. We have performed a retrospective subset analysis of a previously reported prospective phase 2 trial evaluating efficacy and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine (G) and carboplatin (C) in elderly patients with CUP. Materials and methods: In the original study, 51 patients with CUP, who had ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2, were treated with G 1000mg/m
2
iv days 1 and 8, and C AUC 5 iv day 8 every 3weeks to a maximum of 9 cycles. A subset of patients aged ≥65years were re-analysed for response rate, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). These data were subsequently compared with the remaining patients aged <65years. Results: Data for 29 patients aged ≥ 65. years were compared with 22 patients aged < 65. years. For patients ≥ 65 years, response rate (RR) was 38%, median PFS was 20. weeks and median OS was 37. weeks. For patients < 65 years, RR was 14%, median PFS was 11. weeks and median OS was 33. weeks. The differences in PFS and OS were not statistically significant. Significant toxicity (predominantly myelosuppression) was recorded in 45% of patients ≥ 65 years and 32% in patients < 65 years, but was considered generally manageable for all patients. Conclusions: The GC regimen is active in CUP with excellent tolerability and should be considered for elderly patients with CUP.
AB -
Objective: Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) remains a significant oncological problem for the elderly. Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment but the ideal regimen remains uncertain. We have performed a retrospective subset analysis of a previously reported prospective phase 2 trial evaluating efficacy and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine (G) and carboplatin (C) in elderly patients with CUP. Materials and methods: In the original study, 51 patients with CUP, who had ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2, were treated with G 1000mg/m
2
iv days 1 and 8, and C AUC 5 iv day 8 every 3weeks to a maximum of 9 cycles. A subset of patients aged ≥65years were re-analysed for response rate, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). These data were subsequently compared with the remaining patients aged <65years. Results: Data for 29 patients aged ≥ 65. years were compared with 22 patients aged < 65. years. For patients ≥ 65 years, response rate (RR) was 38%, median PFS was 20. weeks and median OS was 37. weeks. For patients < 65 years, RR was 14%, median PFS was 11. weeks and median OS was 33. weeks. The differences in PFS and OS were not statistically significant. Significant toxicity (predominantly myelosuppression) was recorded in 45% of patients ≥ 65 years and 32% in patients < 65 years, but was considered generally manageable for all patients. Conclusions: The GC regimen is active in CUP with excellent tolerability and should be considered for elderly patients with CUP.
KW - Carcinoma of unknown primary
KW - Elderly
KW - Gemcitabine-carboplatin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054963052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jgo.2011.08.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jgo.2011.08.003
M3 - Article
SN - 1879-4068
VL - 2
SP - 233
EP - 238
JO - Journal of Geriatric Oncology
JF - Journal of Geriatric Oncology
IS - 4
ER -