General practice staff and patient experiences of a multicomponent intervention for people at high risk of poor health outcomes: a qualitative study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
33 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: This study reports the experiences of general practice staff and patients at high risk of poor health outcomes who took part in a clustered randomised controlled trial of a multicomponent general practice intervention. The intervention comprised patient enrolment to a preferred General Practitioner (GP) to promote continuity of care, access to longer GP appointments, and timely general practice follow-up after hospital care episodes. The aims of the study were to better understand participant’s (practice staff and patients) perspectives of the intervention, their views on whether the intervention had improved general practice services, reduced hospital admissions and finally whether they believed the intervention would be sustainable after the trial had completed. 

Methods: A qualitative study design with semi-structured interviews was employed. The practice staff sample was drawn from both the control and intervention groups. The patient sample was drawn from those who had expressed an interest in taking part in an interview during the trial and who had also experienced a recent hospital care episode. 

Results: Interviews were conducted with 41 practice staff and 45 patients. Practice staff and patients expressed support for the value of appointments with a regular GP and having sufficient time in appointments for the provision of comprehensive care. There were mixed views with respect to the extent to which the intervention had improved services. The positive changes reported were related to services being provided in a more proactive, thorough, and systematic manner with a greater emphasis on team based care involving the Practice Nurse. Patients nominated after hours care and financial considerations as the key reasons for seeking hospital care. Practice staff noted that the intervention would be difficult to sustain financially in the absence of additional funding. 

Conclusions: The multicomponent intervention was supported by practice staff and patients and some patients perceived that it had led to improvements in care.

Original languageEnglish
Article number18
Number of pages12
JournalBMC Primary Care
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Chronic disease
  • Continuity of care
  • GP appointment length
  • GP follow-up
  • Health services
  • Qualitative study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'General practice staff and patient experiences of a multicomponent intervention for people at high risk of poor health outcomes: a qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this