TY - JOUR
T1 - Generation of bivalent chromatin domains during cell fate decisions
AU - De Gobbi, Marco
AU - Garrick, David
AU - Lynch, Magnus
AU - Vernimmen, Douglas
AU - Hughes, Jim
AU - Goardon, Nicolas
AU - Luc, Sidinh
AU - Lower, Karen
AU - Sloane-Stanley, Jackie
AU - Cristina, Pina
AU - Soneji, Shamit
AU - Renella, Raffaele
AU - Enver, Tariq
AU - Taylor, Stephen
AU - Jacobsen, Sten
AU - Vyas, Paresh
AU - Gibbons, Richard
AU - Higgs, Doug
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Background: In self-renewing, pluripotent cells, bivalent chromatin modification is thought to silence (H3K27me3) lineage control genes while 'poising' (H3K4me3) them for subsequent activation during differentiation, implying an important role for epigenetic modification in directing cell fate decisions. However, rather than representing an equivalently balanced epigenetic mark, the patterns and levels of histone modifications at bivalent genes can vary widely and the criteria for identifying this chromatin signature are poorly defined. Results: Here, we initially show how chromatin status alters during lineage commitment and differentiation at a single well characterised bivalent locus. In addition we have determined how chromatin modifications at this locus change with gene expression in both ensemble and single cell analyses. We also show, on a global scale, how mRNA expression may be reflected in the ratio of H3K4me3/H3K27me3. Conclusions: While truly 'poised' bivalently modified genes may exist, the original hypothesis that all bivalent genes are epigenetically premarked for subsequent expression might be oversimplistic. In fact, from the data presented in the present work, it is equally possible that many genes that appear to be bivalent in pluripotent and multipotent cells may simply be stochastically expressed at low levels in the process of multilineage priming. Although both situations could be considered to be forms of 'poising', the underlying mechanisms and the associated implications are clearly different.
AB - Background: In self-renewing, pluripotent cells, bivalent chromatin modification is thought to silence (H3K27me3) lineage control genes while 'poising' (H3K4me3) them for subsequent activation during differentiation, implying an important role for epigenetic modification in directing cell fate decisions. However, rather than representing an equivalently balanced epigenetic mark, the patterns and levels of histone modifications at bivalent genes can vary widely and the criteria for identifying this chromatin signature are poorly defined. Results: Here, we initially show how chromatin status alters during lineage commitment and differentiation at a single well characterised bivalent locus. In addition we have determined how chromatin modifications at this locus change with gene expression in both ensemble and single cell analyses. We also show, on a global scale, how mRNA expression may be reflected in the ratio of H3K4me3/H3K27me3. Conclusions: While truly 'poised' bivalently modified genes may exist, the original hypothesis that all bivalent genes are epigenetically premarked for subsequent expression might be oversimplistic. In fact, from the data presented in the present work, it is equally possible that many genes that appear to be bivalent in pluripotent and multipotent cells may simply be stochastically expressed at low levels in the process of multilineage priming. Although both situations could be considered to be forms of 'poising', the underlying mechanisms and the associated implications are clearly different.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957926708&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1756-8935-4-9
DO - 10.1186/1756-8935-4-9
M3 - Article
SN - 1756-8935
VL - 4
JO - Epigenetics and Chromatin
JF - Epigenetics and Chromatin
IS - 9
M1 - 9
ER -