Geochemical processes during five years of aquifer storage recovery

Andrew L. Herczeg, Karen J. Rattray, Peter J. Dillon, Paul Pavelic, Karen E. Barry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A key factor in the long-term viability of aquifer storage recovery (ASR) is the extent of mineral solution interaction between two dissimilar water types and consequent impact on water quality and aquifer stability. We collected geochemical and isotopic data from three observation wells located 25, 65, and 325 m from an injection well at an experimental ASR site located in a karstic, confined carbonate aquifer in South Australia. The experiment involved five major injection cycles of a total of 2.5 × 105 m3 of storm water (total dissolved solids [TDS] ∼150 mg/L) into the brackish (TDS ∼2400 mg/L) aquifer. ∼60% of the mixture was pumped out during the fifth year of the experiment. The major effect on water quality within a 25 m radius of the injection well following injection of storm water was carbonate dissolution (35 ± 6 g of CaCO3 dissolved/m3 of aquifer) and sulfide mineral oxidation (50 ± 10 g as FeS 2/m3 after one injection). <0.005% of the total aquifer carbonate matrix was dissolved during each injection event, and ∼0.2% of the total reduced sulfur. Increasing amounts of ambient ground water was entrained into the injected mixture during each of the storage periods. High 14CDIC activities and slightly more negative δ13CDIC values measured immediately after injection events show that substantial CO2(aq) is produced by oxidation of organic matter associated with injectant. There were no detectable geochemical reactions while pumping during the recovery phase in the fifth year of the experiment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)438-445
Number of pages8
JournalGround water
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Geochemical processes during five years of aquifer storage recovery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this