TY - JOUR
T1 - GIS-based spatial prediction of flood prone areas using standalone frequency ratio, logistic regression, weight of evidence and their ensemble techniques
AU - Shafapour Tehrany, Mahyat
AU - Shabani, Farzin
AU - Neamah Jebur, Mustafa
AU - Hong, Haoyuan
AU - Chen, Wei
AU - Xie, Xiaoshen
PY - 2017/12/15
Y1 - 2017/12/15
N2 - The aim of this research was to evaluate the predictive performances of frequency ratio (FR), logistic regression (LR) and weight of evidence (WoE), in flood susceptibility mapping in China. In addition, the ensemble WoE and LR and ensemble FR and LR techniques were applied and used in the evaluation. The flood inventory map, consisting of 196 flood locations, was extracted from a number of sources. The flood inventory data were randomly divided into a testing data-set, allocating 70% for training, and the remaining 30% for validation. The 15 flood conditioning factors included in the spatial database were altitude, slope, aspect, geology, distance from river, distance from road, distance from fault, soil type, land use/cover, rainfall, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Stream Power Index, Topographic Wetness Index, Sediment Transport Index and curvature. For validation, success and prediction rate curves were developed using area under the curve (AUC) method. The results indicated that the highest prediction rate of 90.36% was achieved using the ensemble technique of WoE and LR. The standalone WoE produced the highest prediction rate among the individual methods. It can be concluded that WoE offers a more advanced method of mapping prone areas, compared with the FR and LR methods.
AB - The aim of this research was to evaluate the predictive performances of frequency ratio (FR), logistic regression (LR) and weight of evidence (WoE), in flood susceptibility mapping in China. In addition, the ensemble WoE and LR and ensemble FR and LR techniques were applied and used in the evaluation. The flood inventory map, consisting of 196 flood locations, was extracted from a number of sources. The flood inventory data were randomly divided into a testing data-set, allocating 70% for training, and the remaining 30% for validation. The 15 flood conditioning factors included in the spatial database were altitude, slope, aspect, geology, distance from river, distance from road, distance from fault, soil type, land use/cover, rainfall, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Stream Power Index, Topographic Wetness Index, Sediment Transport Index and curvature. For validation, success and prediction rate curves were developed using area under the curve (AUC) method. The results indicated that the highest prediction rate of 90.36% was achieved using the ensemble technique of WoE and LR. The standalone WoE produced the highest prediction rate among the individual methods. It can be concluded that WoE offers a more advanced method of mapping prone areas, compared with the FR and LR methods.
KW - ensemble modelling
KW - Flood susceptibility mapping
KW - frequency ratio (FR)
KW - GIS
KW - logistic regression (LR)
KW - weight of evidence (WoE)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027318909&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19475705.2017.1362038
DO - 10.1080/19475705.2017.1362038
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85027318909
SN - 1947-5705
VL - 8
SP - 1538
EP - 1561
JO - Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk
JF - Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk
IS - 2
ER -