Abstract
In this reply to Thaler, we take the opportunity to explore two main aspects of his piece to continue the discussion: (1) the integration of data from the social and natural sciences, and (2) the importance of transdisciplinary research. We agree, and highlight that necessary learning, reflections and participation processes are time-intensive for researchers, practitioners and participants. We believe that these discussion pieces are important for informing, engaging, and debating challenges and practices, providing continued opportunities to learn from one another, enabling new forms of research and collaborations to flourish.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2211-2213 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Hydrological Sciences Journal |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue number | 14 |
| Early online date | 4 Nov 2022 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- human–water systems
- interdisciplinary
- knowledge systems
- natural science
- participatory
- social science
- transdisciplinary
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Go together, to go further! Reply to “Human–water research discussion of ‘Guiding principles for hydrologists conducting interdisciplinary research and fieldwork with participants’”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver