Group-based journal review: opportunities for researcher development and enjoyment

Eva Heinrich, Geof Hill, Jo Anne Kelder, Michelle Picard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The availability of expert reviewers, essential for academic publishing, is increasingly under threat, due to workload pressures and lack of development pathways. This inquiry, undertaken by the editors of an emergent higher education journal, draws on reviewers’ experiences as articulated in ‘reviewer stories’ and examines key questions around reviewer experiences and development pathways as well as the role of reviewing in the development of research skills and academic identity formation. This article shines a light on the elusive practice of journal reviewing and confirms group-based review as a successful approach for supporting researcher development and bringing enjoyment into academic practice.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal for Academic Development
Early online date12 Feb 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Feb 2024

Keywords

  • Academic identity formation
  • group-based peer review
  • journal reviewing
  • researcher development
  • scholarship of teaching and learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Group-based journal review: opportunities for researcher development and enjoyment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this