'He did everything he possibly could for me': medical malpractice claimants experiences of lawyer-client relations

Angela Melville, Frank Stephen, Tammy Krause

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Lawyers are obliged to act in the interests of their clients, however, it is not clear how lawyers should do this in practice. Should lawyers follow their clients' instructions without deviation, should they actively manage their clients' expectations, or as many studies suggest, do lawyers place their own interests first? This paper examines how lawyers interact with medical malpractice claimants. It reveals that lawyers take a client-aligned approach, where lawyers acknowledge their client's goals, but do not necessarily do what the client says. We argue that this approach is made necessary by legal and organisational constraints which limit the ability of lawyers to produce the types of outcomes that their clients want.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)171-193
    Number of pages23
    JournalInternational Journal of The Legal Profession
    Volume21
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of ''He did everything he possibly could for me': medical malpractice claimants experiences of lawyer-client relations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this