Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Historical and comparative perspectives on MMR in business, the social sciences and medicine

  • Roslyn Cameron
  • , Heinz Herrmann
  • , Giao Reynolds

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter provides a historical account of the use of mixed methods research (MMR) by examining publishing trends across the last three decades. An overview of the historic development of MMR is presented with an emphasis on key business MMR publications to provide the evolutionary context of this third methodology. We undertake bibliographic mapping to produce a comparative scan of published MMR across three broad Scopus subject areas (business, social sciences, and medicine) before analysing these MMR publications and displaying the results through VOSViewer software. We identify dominant themes in each domain and list the 20 highest cited MMR publications overall. The evolution of MMR and its increasing adoption as evidenced in this study heralds a promising future for methodological innovation and thought leadership. There is always room for methodological refinement, however, and we advocate for more provocative boundary-crossing paradigmatic and methodological thinking that reflects the increasingly complex and disrupted nature of the world we research.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Mixed Methods Research in Business and Management
EditorsRoslyn Cameron, Xanthe Golenko
Place of PublicationCheltenham, UK
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd
Chapter2
Pages11-26
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781800887954
ISBN (Print)9781800887947
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Mixed methods research
  • Scopus
  • VOSViewer
  • Business
  • Management
  • Bibliometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Historical and comparative perspectives on MMR in business, the social sciences and medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this