TY - JOUR
T1 - How and why do participatory women's groups (PWGs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (MCH) care? A systematic review protocol
AU - Preston, Robyn
AU - Rannard, Sam
AU - Felton-Busch, Catrina
AU - Larkins, Sarah
AU - Canuto, Karla
AU - Carlisle, Karen
AU - Evans, Rebecca
AU - Redman-MacLaren, Michelle
AU - Taylor, Judy
AU - Turner, Nalita Nungarrayi
AU - Yeomans, Lee
AU - Sanguineti, Emma
AU - Passey, Megan
AU - Farmer, Jane
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - Introduction: Community-based Participatory Women's Groups (PWGs) have proven to be an effective intervention to improve maternal and child health (MCH) outcomes in low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Less is known about how PWGs exert their effects in LMICs and virtually nothing is known about the contextual issues, processes and power relationships that affect PWG outcomes in high resource settings. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise and critically analyse the current evidence on how and why PWGs improve the quality of MCH care. We aim to demonstrate how PWGs function and why PWG interventions contribute to social and health outcomes.Methods and analysis: The protocol will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. The databases Medline (Ovid): Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (Ebsco); Informit health suite Scopus, Australian HealthInfoNet, the Cochrane Library and other sources will be searched under broad categories: intervention, context and outcomes to 30 June 2019. Ethics and dissemination: As only secondary data will be analysed; ethical approval is not required. The review will be disseminated to relevant organisations and presented in peer-reviewed papers and at conferences. This will be the first attempt to summarise the current available evidence on the characteristics, contextual influences and mechanisms that are associated with the outcomes and effectiveness of PWGs.
AB - Introduction: Community-based Participatory Women's Groups (PWGs) have proven to be an effective intervention to improve maternal and child health (MCH) outcomes in low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Less is known about how PWGs exert their effects in LMICs and virtually nothing is known about the contextual issues, processes and power relationships that affect PWG outcomes in high resource settings. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise and critically analyse the current evidence on how and why PWGs improve the quality of MCH care. We aim to demonstrate how PWGs function and why PWG interventions contribute to social and health outcomes.Methods and analysis: The protocol will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. The databases Medline (Ovid): Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (Ebsco); Informit health suite Scopus, Australian HealthInfoNet, the Cochrane Library and other sources will be searched under broad categories: intervention, context and outcomes to 30 June 2019. Ethics and dissemination: As only secondary data will be analysed; ethical approval is not required. The review will be disseminated to relevant organisations and presented in peer-reviewed papers and at conferences. This will be the first attempt to summarise the current available evidence on the characteristics, contextual influences and mechanisms that are associated with the outcomes and effectiveness of PWGs.
KW - maternal child health
KW - participatory women's groups
KW - systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071896412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1146013
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1078927
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1159601
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030461
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030461
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31492787
AN - SCOPUS:85071896412
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 9
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 9
M1 - e030461
ER -