TY - JOUR
T1 - How can Environmental Health Practitioners contribute to ensure population safety and health during the COVID-19 pandemic?
AU - Rodrigues, Matilde A.
AU - Silva, Manuela V.
AU - Errett, Nicole A.
AU - Davis, Gayle
AU - Lynch, Zena
AU - Dhesi, Surindar
AU - Hannelly, Toni
AU - Mitchell, Graeme
AU - Dyjack, David
AU - Ross, Kirstin E.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the relevance of public health professionals all over the world, in particular Environmental Health Practitioners (EHPs), who played a major role in the containment of the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. However, as in past disasters, their involvement was oriented towards urgent tasks, and did not fully utilize EHPs’ competences and skills. Additionally, due to limited resources, during emergencies EHPs may temporarily transition away from their day-to-day role, potentially increasing other public health and safety risk factors without appropriate surveillance or intervention. To overcome this and prepare for possible future pandemics, it is important to identify and discuss the key roles of EHPs in different countries, providing a common framework for practices that can contribute to population safety and health. To this end, an international workgroup was established to discuss current environmental health practices and challenges across different countries during the pandemic. Findings from discussions concluded that, despite the observed differences across the countries, EHPs are one of the main public health emergency preparedness and response actors. However, since resources are still lagging significantly behind need, we argue that the role of these professionals during pandemics should be focused on practices that have higher impact to support population health and safety.
AB - The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the relevance of public health professionals all over the world, in particular Environmental Health Practitioners (EHPs), who played a major role in the containment of the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. However, as in past disasters, their involvement was oriented towards urgent tasks, and did not fully utilize EHPs’ competences and skills. Additionally, due to limited resources, during emergencies EHPs may temporarily transition away from their day-to-day role, potentially increasing other public health and safety risk factors without appropriate surveillance or intervention. To overcome this and prepare for possible future pandemics, it is important to identify and discuss the key roles of EHPs in different countries, providing a common framework for practices that can contribute to population safety and health. To this end, an international workgroup was established to discuss current environmental health practices and challenges across different countries during the pandemic. Findings from discussions concluded that, despite the observed differences across the countries, EHPs are one of the main public health emergency preparedness and response actors. However, since resources are still lagging significantly behind need, we argue that the role of these professionals during pandemics should be focused on practices that have higher impact to support population health and safety.
KW - Emergency
KW - Environmental Health
KW - Pandemic
KW - Population safety
KW - Public Health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098981384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105136
DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105136
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85098981384
SN - 0925-7535
VL - 136
JO - SAFETY SCIENCE
JF - SAFETY SCIENCE
M1 - 105136
ER -