Abstract
In this evidenced-based review, we examine the current available literature to help answer the question 'In neonates requiring long-term central access [patient], does removal of the umbilical venous catheter (UVC) on days 5-7 and replacement with a peripherally inserted central catheter line [intervention] compared with leaving the UVC in situ [comparison] reduce rates of central line-associated bloodstream infections [outcome]?'.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 649-652 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- catheter-related infections/prevention and control
- infant
- newborn
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How long should umbilical venous catheters remain in place in neonates who require long-term (≥5-7 days) central venous access?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver