Abstract
For third-sector organizations (TSOs) that deliver publicly funded health and community services, accountability practices are predominantly shaped by the imperatives of government funders. However, the ensuing public management accountability regimes can undermine TSO responsiveness to communities, align poorly with imperatives of professional staff, create high transaction costs and threaten TSO sustainability. Public management literature lacks an adequate framework for conceptualizing TSO accountability. We outline a conceptual framework - the 'triskele' - for analysing accountability tensions experienced by TSOs that could assist funders and other stakeholders with the difficult task of designing more workable and meaningful accountability regimes for all stakeholders.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 925-944 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Public Management Review |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- accountability
- contracting
- health services
- public management
- Third-sector organizations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How not to kill the golden goose: Reconceptualising accountability environments of community-based third sector organisations: Reconceptualizing accountability environments of third-sector organizations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver