How to overcome taxonomical problems in the study of Internet use disorders and what to do with "smartphone addiction"?

Christian Montag, Elisa Wegmann, Rayna Sariyska, Zsolt Demetrovics, Matthias Brand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

277 Citations (Scopus)
39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims: The present theoretical paper introduces the smartphone technology as a challenge for diagnostics in the study of Internet use disorders and reflects on the term "smartphone addiction."Methods: Such a reflection is carried out against the background of a literature review and the inclusion of Gaming Disorder in ICD-11. Results: We believe that it is necessary to divide research on Internet use disorder (IUD) into a mobile and non-mobile IUD branch. This is important because certain applications such as the messenger application WhatsApp have originally been developed for smartphones and enfold their power and attractiveness mainly on mobile devices. Discussion and conclusions: Going beyond the argumentation for distinguishing between mobile and non-mobile IUD, it is of high relevance for scientists to better describe and understand what persons are actually (over-)using. This is stressed by a number of examples, explicitly targeting not only the diverse contents used in the online world, but also the exact behavior on each platform. Among others, it matters if a person is more of an active producer of content or passive consumer of social media.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)908-914
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Behavioral Addictions
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Internet addiction
  • Internet use disorder
  • Problematic Internet use
  • Problematic smartphone use
  • Smartphone addiction
  • Smartphone use disorder

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to overcome taxonomical problems in the study of Internet use disorders and what to do with "smartphone addiction"?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this