Huck Finn, Moral Reasons and Sympathy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


In his influential paper The Conscience of Huckleberry Finn, Jonathan Bennett suggests that Huck's failure to turn in the runaway slave Jim as his conscience a conscience distorted by racism tells him he ought to is not merely right but also praiseworthy. James Montmarquet however argues against what he sees here as Bennett's anti-intellectualism in moral psychology that insofar as Huck lacks and so fails to act on the moral belief that he should help Jim his action is not praiseworthy. In this paper I suggest that we should reject Montmarquet's claim here; that the case of Huck Finn indicates rather how many of our everyday moral responses to others do not and need not depend on any particular moral beliefs we hold about them or their situation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)583-593
Number of pages11
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012


Dive into the research topics of 'Huck Finn, Moral Reasons and Sympathy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this