If EQ-5D-5L Mobility Dimension Ratings Are High, Is Life-Space Assessment a Clinically Sensible Next Step? Data from a Population Survey

Slavica Kochovska, Sungwon Chang, Jane L. Phillips, David C. Currow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Impaired health states can limit a person’s mobility, often progressively for people with life-limiting illnesses. Quantifying mobility changes is crucial for individual clinical care and service planning. 

Objective: To explore any correlation between EQ-5D-5L’s mobility dimension ratings and Life-Space Assessment (LSA) from a population sample. 

Methods: An online population survey of Australian adults, nationally-representative by key demographics. An analysis of variance examined each level of the EQ-5D-5L mobility dimension rating against its LSA scores; Kendall’s Tau assessed correlation. 

Results: Participants (n = 6366) were 53% women, mean age 46.1 years (SD 18.6), and mean LSA score 78.0 (SD = 27.5; possible range 0-120). At each EQ-5D-5L mobility dimension level there was a significant difference between LSA scores (p < 0.001), and a moderate negative correlation (Kendall’s tau b = −0.342) between the two measures. 

Conclusion: Given the relationship defined, EQ-5D-5L mobility dimension ratings may prompt clinicians to consider further evaluation with the more detailed Life-Space Assessment. .

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1527-1530
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Palliative Medicine
Volume27
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • cross-sectional survey
  • functional assessment
  • mobility
  • population survey
  • quality of life

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'If EQ-5D-5L Mobility Dimension Ratings Are High, Is Life-Space Assessment a Clinically Sensible Next Step? Data from a Population Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this