Impact of population-based or targeted BMD interventions on fracture incidence

N. C. Harvey, J. A. Kanis, E. Liu, L. Vandenput, M. Lorentzon, C. Cooper, E. McCloskey, H. Johansson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Summary: In a simulated population of older women, we demonstrate that an upward shift in the population distribution of BMD by approximately 0.3SD may decrease the risk of incident fractures to the same extent as an intervention targeted to those with T-score less than −2.5. Introduction: To investigate the impact of population level or targeted alterations to BMD on the incidence of fractures. Methods: We used a simulated cohort of 49,242 women with age and body mass index distribution from the UK, and prevalence of other clinical risk factors based on European FRAX® cohorts. Using FRAX probabilities of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF: hip, clinical vertebral, distal forearm, proximal humerus) and hip fracture, calculated with femoral neck BMD, we determined the expected number of fractures over 10 years, stratified by 10-year age band from 50 years. We then investigated the effect of (i) uplifting all individuals with T-score below −2.5 to be exactly −2.5 (high-risk strategy) and (ii) shifting the entire BMD distribution upwards (population strategy). Results: Overall, the high-risk strategy prevented 573 MOF including 465 hip fractures. Moving the BMD T-score distribution upward by 0.27SD gave an equivalent reduction in numbers of MOF; for hip fractures prevented, this was 0.35SD. A global upward 0.25SD BMD shift prevented 524 MOF including 354 hip fractures, with corresponding figures for an increase of 0.5SD being 973 MOF prevented and 640 hip fractures prevented. The ratio of hip fracture to MOF prevented differed by the two approaches, such that for the high-risk strategy, the ratio was 0.81, and for the population strategy was 0.68 (0.25SD BMD uplift) and 0.66 (0.5SD BMD uplift). The numbers of fractures prevented by the high-risk strategy increased with age. In contrast, the age-related increase in numbers of fractures prevented with the population strategy rose with age, but peaked in the 70–79-year age band and declined thereafter. Conclusions: Both strategies reduced the numbers of expected incident fractures, with contrasting relative impacts by age and fracture site. Whilst the current analysis used UK/European anthropometric/risk factor distributions, further analyses calibrated to the distributions in other settings globally may be readily undertaken. Overall, these findings support the investigation of both population level interventions and those targeted at high fracture risk groups.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages7
JournalOsteoporosis International
Early online date23 Mar 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Mar 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • BMD
  • Epidemiology
  • Fracture
  • Osteoporosis
  • Population
  • Targeted

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of population-based or targeted BMD interventions on fracture incidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this