Implementation strategies for high impact nephrology trials: the end of the trial is just the beginning

Donna M. Reidlinger, David W. Johnson, Jonathan C. Craig, Stephen P. McDonald, Alistair R. Mallard, Laura E. Robison, Germaine Wong, Carmel M. Hawley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
75 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract


There remains wide variation in treatment patterns and outcomes for kidney patients, and nephrology continues to lag behind other medical specialties in the number and quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).1 As currently conducted, RCTs require substantial investment in time and resources with enormous effort poured into trial design, funding, partnerships, data acquisition, analysis, and publications. Less attention is paid to activities to maximize practice and policy impact, and evaluation of evidence uptake commonly occurs only through the narrow lens of output metrics in peer-reviewed literature.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1222-1227
Number of pages6
JournalKidney International
Volume102
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • clinical trials
  • healthcare systems
  • implementability
  • knowledge translation
  • research waste

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implementation strategies for high impact nephrology trials: the end of the trial is just the beginning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this