Improving the accuracy and comparability of model-based economic evaluations of health technologies for reimbursement decisions: A methodological framework for the development of reference models

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Increasingly, decision analytic models are used within economic evaluations of health technologies (e.g., pharmaceuticals) submitted to national reimbursement bodies in countries like Australia and UK, where such models play a fundamental role in informing public funding decisions. Concerns regarding the accuracy of model outputs and hence the credibility of national reimbursement decisions are frequently raised. We propose a framework for developing reference models for specific diseases to inform economic evaluations of health technologies and their appraisal. The structure of a reference model reflects the natural history of the condition under study and defines the clinical events to be represented, the relationships between the events, and the effect of patient characteristics on the probability and timing of events. We contend that the use of reference models will improve the accuracy and comparability of public funding decisions. This can lead to the more efficient allocation of public funds.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)325-332
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Sep 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • model uncertainty
  • sensitivity analysis
  • reference model

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Improving the accuracy and comparability of model-based economic evaluations of health technologies for reimbursement decisions: A methodological framework for the development of reference models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this