Indirect Comparison of Lenadogene Nolparvovec Gene Therapy Versus Natural History in Patients with Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Carrying the m.11778G>A MT-ND4 Mutation

Valerio Carelli, Nancy J Newman, Patrick Yu-Wai-Man, Valérie Biousse, Mark L Moster, Prem S Subramanian, Catherine Vignal-Clermont, An-Guor Wang, Sean P Donahue, Bart P Leroy, Robert C Sergott, Thomas Klopstock, Alfredo A Sadun, Gema Rebolleda Fernández, Bart K Chwalisz, Rudrani Banik, Jean François Girmens, Chiara La Morgia, Adam A DeBusk, Neringa JurkuteClaudia Priglinger, Rustum Karanjia, Constant Josse, Julie Salzmann, François Montestruc, Michel Roux, Magali Taiel, José-Alain Sahel, LHON Study Group, Celia Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)
10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: Lenadogene nolparvovec is a promising novel gene therapy for patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) carrying the m.11778G>A ND4 mutation (MT-ND4). A previous pooled analysis of phase 3 studies showed an improvement in visual acuity of patients injected with lenadogene nolparvovec compared to natural history. Here, we report updated results by incorporating data from the latest phase 3 trial REFLECT in the pool, increasing the number of treated patients from 76 to 174. 

Methods: The visual acuity of 174 MT-ND4-carrying patients with LHON injected in one or both eyes with lenadogene nolparvovec from four pooled phase 3 studies (REVERSE, RESCUE and their long-term extension trial RESTORE; and REFLECT trial) was compared to the spontaneous evolution of an external control group of 208 matched patients from 11 natural history studies. 

Results: Treated patients showed a clinically relevant and sustained improvement in their visual acuity when compared to natural history. Mean improvement versus natural history was − 0.30 logMAR (+ 15 ETDRS letters equivalent) at last observation (P < 0.01) with a maximal follow-up of 3.9 years after injection. Most treated eyes were on-chart as compared to less than half of natural history eyes at 48 months after vision loss (89.6% versus 48.1%; P < 0.01) and at last observation (76.1% versus 44.4%; P < 0.01). When we adjusted for covariates of interest (gender, age of onset, ethnicity, and duration of follow-up), the estimated mean gain was − 0.43 logMAR (+ 21.5 ETDRS letters equivalent) versus natural history at last observation (P < 0.0001). Treatment effect was consistent across all phase 3 clinical trials. Analyses from REFLECT suggest a larger treatment effect in patients receiving bilateral injection compared to unilateral injection. 

Conclusion: The efficacy of lenadogene nolparvovec in improving visual acuity in MT-ND4 LHON was confirmed in a large cohort of patients, compared to the spontaneous natural history decline. Bilateral injection of gene therapy may offer added benefits over unilateral injection. 

Trial Registration Numbers: NCT02652780 (REVERSE); NCT02652767 (RESCUE); NCT03406104 (RESTORE); NCT03293524 (REFLECT); NCT03295071 (REALITY).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)401-429
Number of pages29
JournalOphthalmology and Therapy
Volume12
Issue number1
Early online date30 Nov 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Gene therapy
  • Leber hereditary optic neuropathy
  • LHON
  • MT-ND4
  • Natural history
  • Visual acuity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Indirect Comparison of Lenadogene Nolparvovec Gene Therapy Versus Natural History in Patients with Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Carrying the m.11778G>A MT-ND4 Mutation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this