Individual Variability and Predictors of Driving Simulator Impairment in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Andrey Vakulin, Peter Catcheside, Stuart Baulk, Nicholas Antic, Siobhan Banks, Jillian Dorrian, Ronald McEvoy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    51 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Study Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with driving impairment and road crashes. However, daytime function varies widely between patients presenting a clinical challenge when assessing crash risk. This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients showing "normal" versus "abnormal" driving simulator performance and examine whether anthropometric, clinical, and neurobehavioral measures predict abnormal driving. Methods: Thirty-eight OSA patients performed a 90-min simulated driving task under 3 conditions: normal sleep, restricted sleep (4 h in bed), and normal sleep + alcohol (BAC∼0.05 g/dL). Patients were classifi ed as "resilient" drivers if, under all 3 experimental conditions their mean steering deviation fell within 2 standard deviations of the mean steering deviation of 20 controls driving under baseline normal sleep conditions, or a "vulnerable" driver if mean steering deviation was outside this range in at least one experimental condition. Potentially predictive baseline anthropometric, clinical, neurocognitive, and cortical activation measures were examined. Results: Of the 38 OSA patients examined, 23 (61%) and 15 (39%) were classifi ed as resilient and vulnerable drivers, respectively. There were no differences in baseline measures between the groups, although the proportion of females was greater and self-reported weekly driving exposure was less among vulnerable drivers (p < 0.05). On univariate analysis gender, weekly driving hours, and auditory event related potential P2 amplitude were weakly associated with group status. Multivariate analysis showed weekly driving hours (OR 0.69, 95%CI, 0.51-0.94, p = 0.02) and P2 amplitude (OR 1.34, 95%CI 1.02-1.76, p = 0.035) independently predicted vulnerable drivers. Conclusions: Most OSA patients demonstrated normal simulated driving performance despite exposure to further sleep loss or alcohol. Most baseline measures did not differentiate between resilient and vulnerable drivers, although prior driving experience and cortical function were predictive. Novel measures to assist identifi cation of OSA patients at risk of driving impairment and possibly accidents are needed. Trial Registration: Data presented in this manuscript was collected as part of a clinical trial "Experimental Investigations of Driving Impairment in Obstructive Sleep Apnea." Trial ID: ACTRN12610000009011, URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial-view.aspx?ID=334979.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)647-655
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
    Volume10
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • Driving performance
    • Neurobehavioral function
    • Obstructive sleep apnea

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Individual Variability and Predictors of Driving Simulator Impairment in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this