TY - CHAP
T1 - Intellectual soup
T2 - On the reformulation and repatriation of Indigenous knowledge
AU - Smith, Claire
AU - Copley Senior, Vincent
AU - Jackson, Gary
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - This paper presents a new conceptual framework for the ownership of cultural and intellectual property that is developed by researchers and Indigenous peoples. We argue that ethnographic research produces a new form of knowledge, the creation of an ‘intellectual soup’ that arises from a reformulation of two intellectual traditions and bodies of knowledge. We conclude that all of the people who played a major role in contributing ingredients, tweaking the recipe or providing facilities or equipment have some rights in that intellectual soup. This paper contributes to discussions by archaeologists, Indigenous communities and other stakeholders who are seeking to develop more equitable and successful resolutions and policies regarding the cultural and intellectual property issues. The conceptual framework should help others to constructively negotiate cultural and intellectual property issues, foster positive relationships and head off adversarial or exploitative situations. Though the case study is that of an Australian Aboriginal group, the issues we raise have international applicability.
AB - This paper presents a new conceptual framework for the ownership of cultural and intellectual property that is developed by researchers and Indigenous peoples. We argue that ethnographic research produces a new form of knowledge, the creation of an ‘intellectual soup’ that arises from a reformulation of two intellectual traditions and bodies of knowledge. We conclude that all of the people who played a major role in contributing ingredients, tweaking the recipe or providing facilities or equipment have some rights in that intellectual soup. This paper contributes to discussions by archaeologists, Indigenous communities and other stakeholders who are seeking to develop more equitable and successful resolutions and policies regarding the cultural and intellectual property issues. The conceptual framework should help others to constructively negotiate cultural and intellectual property issues, foster positive relationships and head off adversarial or exploitative situations. Though the case study is that of an Australian Aboriginal group, the issues we raise have international applicability.
KW - Ronald Berndt
KW - intellectual property
KW - Mabo decision
KW - Indigenous
KW - Intellectual property
KW - Australian aboriginal
KW - Cultural heritage
KW - Cultural rights
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68652-3_11
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073286784&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-68652-3_2
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-68652-3_2
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9783319686516
T3 - SpringerBriefs in Archaeology
SP - 9
EP - 28
BT - Shared Knowledge, Shared Power
PB - Springer
ER -