Intensive care costing methodology: Cost benefit analysis of mask continuous positive airway pressure for severe cardiogenic pulmonary oedema

A. W. Holt, A. D. Bersten, S. Fuller, R. K. Piper, L. I.G. Worthley, A. E. Vedig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Costing data for intensive care admissions is important not only for unit funding but also for cost outcome analysis of new therapies. This paper presents an intensive care episode costing methodology using the example of a cost-benefit analysis of mask CPAP for severe cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (CPO). This analysis examines the intervention of admitting all patients with severe CPO to the intensive care unit for mask CPAP compared with the previous practice of admitting only patients failing conventional non-CPAP treatment and requiring mechanical ventilation. The episode costs were determined from a prospective study which showed mask CPAP reduced the need for mechanical ventilation from 35% to 0%. The mean cost of a mask CPAP episode was $1,156 with a mean slay of 1.2 days compared with ventilated patients $5,055 and 4.2 days. The major contributors to cost in both groups were nursing and medical salaries and hospital overheads The cost of previous estimated yearly caseload of 35 ventilated patients ($176,925) was greater than the cost associated with an increased caseload of 100 mask CPAP patients ($115,600). We conclude that despite an increase in admissions mask CPAP for severe CPO is cost-effective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-174
Number of pages5
JournalAnaesthesia and Intensive Care
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1994
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cardiogenic
  • Costing
  • Intensive care
  • Mask CPAP
  • Pulmonary oedema

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Intensive care costing methodology: Cost benefit analysis of mask continuous positive airway pressure for severe cardiogenic pulmonary oedema'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this