Intercultural capacity deficits: Contested geographies of coexistence in natural resource management

Richard Howitt, Kim Doohan, Sandie Suchet-Pearson, Sherrie Cross, Rebecca Lawrence, Gaim Lunkapis, Samantha Muller, Sarah Prout, Siri Veland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    29 Citations (Scopus)


    Focusing on the coexistence of competing and contested interests in intercultural natural resource management (NRM) systems in Australia and Malaysia, this paper explores the ways in which ontological pluralism and the interplay of socio-cultural, political-economic and biophysical influences shape NRM systems. We aim to foster a discursive space in which to reframe the challenges of capacity building in the rapidly changing spaces of intercultural NRM systems. The paper synthesizes the conceptual arguments of field research to conclude that capacity deficits of dominant institutions, processes and knowledge systems drive many systemic failures in land and sea management affecting Indigenous peoples. We advocate urgent action to build intercultural competence and new capacities and competencies in those institutions. The paper reframes intercultural NRM in terms of coexistence and invites wider debate about these 'new geographies of coexistence' in intercultural NRM systems.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)126-140
    Number of pages15
    JournalAsia Pacific Viewpoint
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013


    • Coexistence
    • Indigenous rights
    • Intercultural competence
    • Intercultural natural resource management systems


    Dive into the research topics of 'Intercultural capacity deficits: Contested geographies of coexistence in natural resource management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this