TY - JOUR
T1 - International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches–Chronic Kidney Disease (ISCHEMIA-CKD)
T2 - Rationale and design
AU - Bangalore, Sripal
AU - Maron, David J.
AU - Fleg, Jerome L.
AU - O'Brien, Sean M.
AU - Herzog, Charles A.
AU - Stone, Gregg W.
AU - Mark, Daniel B.
AU - Spertus, John A.
AU - Alexander, Karen P.
AU - Sidhu, Mandeep S.
AU - Chertow, Glenn M.
AU - Boden, William E.
AU - Hochman, Judith S.
AU - The ISCHEMIA-CKD Research Group
AU - Selvanayagam, Joseph B
AU - Gleadle, Jonathan M
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and stable ischemic heart disease are at markedly increased risk of cardiovascular events. Prior trials comparing a strategy of optimal medical therapy (OMT) with or without revascularization have largely excluded patients with advanced CKD. Whether a routine invasive approach when compared with a conservative strategy is beneficial in such patients is unknown. Methods: ISCHEMIA-CKD is a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–funded randomized trial designed to determine the comparative effectiveness of an initial invasive strategy (cardiac catheterization and optimal revascularization [percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, if suitable] plus OMT) versus a conservative strategy (OMT alone, with cardiac catheterization and revascularization [percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, if suitable] reserved for failure of OMT) on long-term clinical outcomes in 777 patients with advanced CKD (defined as those with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73m2 or on dialysis) and moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to the invasive or a conservative strategy. The primary end point is a composite of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Major secondary endpoints are a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest; angina control; and disease-specific quality of life. Safety outcomes such as initiation of maintenance dialysis and a composite of initiation of maintenance dialysis or death will be reported. The trial is projected to have 80% power to detect a 22% to 24% reduction in the primary composite end point with the invasive strategy when compared with the conservative strategy. Conclusions: ISCHEMIA-CKD will determine whether an initial invasive management strategy improves clinical outcomes when added to OMT in patients with advanced CKD and stable ischemic heart disease.
AB - Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and stable ischemic heart disease are at markedly increased risk of cardiovascular events. Prior trials comparing a strategy of optimal medical therapy (OMT) with or without revascularization have largely excluded patients with advanced CKD. Whether a routine invasive approach when compared with a conservative strategy is beneficial in such patients is unknown. Methods: ISCHEMIA-CKD is a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–funded randomized trial designed to determine the comparative effectiveness of an initial invasive strategy (cardiac catheterization and optimal revascularization [percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, if suitable] plus OMT) versus a conservative strategy (OMT alone, with cardiac catheterization and revascularization [percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, if suitable] reserved for failure of OMT) on long-term clinical outcomes in 777 patients with advanced CKD (defined as those with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73m2 or on dialysis) and moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to the invasive or a conservative strategy. The primary end point is a composite of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Major secondary endpoints are a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest; angina control; and disease-specific quality of life. Safety outcomes such as initiation of maintenance dialysis and a composite of initiation of maintenance dialysis or death will be reported. The trial is projected to have 80% power to detect a 22% to 24% reduction in the primary composite end point with the invasive strategy when compared with the conservative strategy. Conclusions: ISCHEMIA-CKD will determine whether an initial invasive management strategy improves clinical outcomes when added to OMT in patients with advanced CKD and stable ischemic heart disease.
KW - stable ischemic heart disease
KW - cardiovascular events
KW - optimal medical therapy (OMT)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052473569&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa1915925/suppl_file/nejmoa1915925_appendix.pdf
U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.07.023
DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.07.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 30172098
AN - SCOPUS:85052473569
VL - 205
SP - 42
EP - 52
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
SN - 0002-8703
ER -