International Survey of Psychosocial Care for Cancer Survivors in Low-/Middle- and High-Income Countries: Current Practices, Barriers, and Facilitators to Care

Christina Signorelli, Beverley Lim Høeg, Chioma Asuzu, Isabel Centeno, Tania Estapé, Peter Fisher, Wendy Lam, Inbar Levkovich, Sharon Manne, Anne Miles, Louise Mullen, Larissa Nekhlyudov, Cristina Sade, Joanne Shaw, Anna Singleton, Luzia Travado, Miyako Tsuchiya, Jesse Lemmen, Jie Li, Michael JeffordInternational Psycho-Oncology Society Survivorship Special Interest Group, Nicholas Hulbert-Williams, Bogda Koczwara, Xiaohong Liu, Ben Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE 

The number of cancer survivors living with and beyond cancer treatment is rising globally. It is fundamental to understand the extent and type of psychosocial care services offered worldwide. We evaluated models of cancer survivorship care, psychosocial care practices in the post-treatment survivorship phase, and barriers/facilitators to delivery of psychosocial care services, including in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). 

METHODS 

The International Psycho-Oncology Society (IPOS) Survivorship Special Interest Group led a cross-sectional online survey between March and November 2022. Health care professionals and researchers in psycho-oncology were invited through the IPOS global membership, social media, and snowballing. The survey was administered to individuals but included questions related to practices in their country at a national level. 

RESULTS 

Two hundred eighty-three respondents from 37 countries participated (40% from LMICs), with a median of 12 years of experience (IQR, 6-20) in the psycho-oncology field. Participants reported that the most common elements of routine survivorship care were related to the prevention/ management of recurrences/new cancers (74%), physical late effects (59%), and chronic medical conditions (53%), whereas surveillance/ management of psychosocial late effects (27%) and psychosocial/ supportive care (25%) were least common. Service availability was more commonly reported in high-income countries (HICs) than LMICs related to reproductive health (29% v 17%), genetic counseling/support (40% v 20%), and identifying/managing distress (39% v 26%) and pain (66% v 48%). Key barriers included providers focusing on treatment not survivorship (57%), medical not psychosocial care (60%), and a lack of allied health providers to deliver psychosocial care (59%). 

CONCLUSION 

The psychosocial needs of people living with cancer are not adequately available and/or provided in post-treatment survivorship even in HICs, because of barriers at patient, provider, and system levels.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages12
JournalJCO global oncology
Volume10
Early online date23 May 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Survivorship
  • psychosocial care services

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International Survey of Psychosocial Care for Cancer Survivors in Low-/Middle- and High-Income Countries: Current Practices, Barriers, and Facilitators to Care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this