Internationally comparable diagnosis-specific survival probabilities for calculation of the ICD-10-Based Injury Severity Score

Rolf Gedeborg, Margaret Warner, Li-hui Chen, Pauline Gulliver, Colin Cryer, Yvonne Robitaille, Robert Bauer, Clotilde Ubeda, Jens Lauritsen, James Harrison, Geoffrey Henley, John Langley

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    32 Citations (Scopus)


    BACKGROUND: The International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10)-based Injury Severity Score (ICISS) performs well but requires diagnosis-specific survival probabilities (DSPs), which are empirically derived, for its calculation. The objective was to examine if DSPs based on data pooled from several countries could increase accuracy, precision, utility, and international comparability of DSPs and ICISS. METHODS: Australia, Argentina, Austria, Canada, Denmark, New Zealand, and Sweden provided ICD-10-coded injury hospital discharge data, including in-hospital mortality status. Data from the seven countries were pooled using four different methods to create an international collaborative effort ICISS (ICE-ICISS). The ability of the ICISS to predict mortality using the country-specific DSPs and the pooled DSPs was estimated and compared. RESULTS: The pooled DSPs were based on a total of 3,966,550 observations of injury diagnoses from the seven countries. The proportion of injury diagnoses having at least 100 discharges to calculate the DSP varied from 12% to 48% in the country-specific data set and was 66% in the pooled data set. When compared with using a country's own DSPs for ICISS calculation, the pooled DSPs resulted in somewhat reduced discrimination in predicting mortality (difference in c statistic varied from 0.006 to 0.04). Calibration was generally good when the predicted mortality risk was less than 20%. When Danish and Swedish data were used, ICISS was combined with age and sex in a logistic regression model to predict in-hospital mortality. Including age and sex improved both discrimination and calibration substantially, and the differences from using country-specific or pooled DSPs were minor. CONCLUSION: Pooling data from seven countries generated empirically derived DSPs. These pooled DSPs facilitate international comparisons and enables the use of ICISS in all settings where ICD-10 hospital discharge diagnoses are available. The modest reduction in performance of the ICE-ICISS compared with the country-specific scores is unlikely to outweigh the benefit of internationally comparable Injury Severity Scores possible with pooled data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological study, level III.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)358-365
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014


    • hospital mortality
    • injury
    • population surveillance
    • Trauma
    • trauma severity indices


    Dive into the research topics of 'Internationally comparable diagnosis-specific survival probabilities for calculation of the ICD-10-Based Injury Severity Score'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this