Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Intraoperative fluoroscopic protocol to avoid rotational malalignment after nailing of tibia shaft fractures: introduction of the ‘C-Arm Rotational View (CARV)’

  • Nils Jan Bleeker
  • , Job N. Doornberg
  • , Kaj ten Duis
  • , Mostafa El Moumni
  • , Inge H.F. Reininga
  • , Ruurd L. Jaarsma
  • , Frank F.A. IJpma
  • , on behalf of the Traumaplatform 3D Consortium
  • , M. Cain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: Rotational malalignment (≥ 10°) is a frequent pitfall of intramedullary-nailing of tibial shaft fractures. This study aimed to develop an intraoperative fluoroscopy protocol, coined ‘C-Arm Rotational View (CARV)’, to significantly reduce the risk for rotational malalignment and to test its clinical feasibility.

Methods: A cadaver and clinical feasibility study was conducted to develop the CARV-technique, that included a standardized intraoperative fluoroscopy sequence of predefined landmarks on the uninjured and injured leg in which the rotation of the C-arm was used to verify for rotational alignment. A mid-shaft tibia fracture was simulated in a cadaver and an unlocked intramedullary-nail was inserted. Random degrees of rotational malalignment were applied using a hand-held goniometer via reference wires at the fracture site. Ten surgeons, blinded for the applied rotation, performed rotational corrections according to (1) current clinical practice after single-leg and dual-leg draping, and (2) according to the CARV-protocol. The primary outcome measure was the accuracy of the corrections relative to neutral tibial alignment. The CARV-protocol was tested in a small clinical cohort. 

Results: In total, 180 rotational corrections were performed by 10 surgeons. Correction according to clinical practice using single-leg and dual-leg draping resulted in a median difference of, respectively, 10.0° (IQR 5.0°) and 10.0° (IQR 5.0°) relative to neutral alignment. Single-leg and dual-leg draping resulted in malalignment (≥10°) in, respectively, 67% and 58% of the corrections. Standardized correction using the CARV resulted in a median difference of 5.0° (IQR 5.0°) relative to neutral alignment, with only 12% categorized as malalignment (≥10°). The incidence of rotational malalignment after application of the CARV decreased from 67% and 58% to 12% (p = <0.001). Both consultants and residents successfully applied the CARV-protocol. Finally, three clinical patients with a tibial shaft fracture were treated according to the CARV-protocol, resulting all in acceptable alignment (<10°) based on postoperative CT-measurements.

Conclusion: This study introduces an easy-to-use and clinically feasible standardized intraoperative fluoroscopy protocol coined ‘C-arm rotational view (CARV)’ to minimize the risk for rotational malalignment following intramedullary-nailing of tibial shaft fractures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2329-2336
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Volume49
Issue number6
Early online date30 Jul 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Intramedullary-nailing
  • Rotational malalignment
  • Tibia shaft fractures
  • ‘C-Arm Rotational View (CARV)’

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intraoperative fluoroscopic protocol to avoid rotational malalignment after nailing of tibia shaft fractures: introduction of the ‘C-Arm Rotational View (CARV)’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this