Investigating the prevalence of mixed methods research (MMR) in health management and the associated methodological challenges

Jennifer Kosiol, Maryam Sassoli, Ingy Shafei, Ashley Cully, Ros Cameron, Anneke Fitzgerald

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

An increasing interest in the pragmatic aspects of health management research demand a Mixed Methods Research (MMR) approach to assist in ensuring a deep understanding of complex research questions. However, the prevalence of MMR in academic health management journals is unknown. In order to determine prevalence, we examined 1352 empirical articles and 6% explicitly referred to a mixed methods research design. Methodologically, this paper focusses on the issues encountered in undertaking this prevalence study: (a) difficulty in determining actual research methods from an abstract, and (b) inability to weigh the actual balance of quantitative and qualitative methods in the articles assessed.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication33rd Annual Australian & New Zealand Academy of Management Conference
Subtitle of host publicationWicked solutions to wicked problems: the challenges facing management research and practice
PublisherAustralian & New Zealand Academy of Management
Pages1217-1217
Number of pages1
ISBN (Electronic)978-0-6481109-5-8
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Event33rd Annual Australian & New Zealand Academy of Management Conference - Pullman Cairns International Hotel , Cairns, Australia
Duration: 3 Dec 20196 Dec 2019
Conference number: 33rd

Conference

Conference33rd Annual Australian & New Zealand Academy of Management Conference
Abbreviated titleANZAM 2019
Country/TerritoryAustralia
CityCairns
Period3/12/196/12/19

Bibliographical note

Abstract no. 236

Keywords

  • Mixed methods research (MMR)
  • Health management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating the prevalence of mixed methods research (MMR) in health management and the associated methodological challenges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this