Irbesartan in patients with atrial fibrillation

Salim Yusuf, Jeff Healey, Janice Pogue, Susan Chrolavicius, Marcus Flather, Robert Hart, Stefan Hohnloser, Campbell Joyner, Marc Pfeffer, Stuart Connolly, R. A. Guerrero, O. A. Allall, L M Amuchastegui, M. H Boskis, M H Bustamante Labarta, A Caccavo, C. R. Castellanos, P. A. Chialle, C. A. Cuneo, J. F. EstepoA. A. Fernandez, M A Garrido, L. A. Guzman, A. R. Hershson, M. A. Hominal, H. L. Luciardi, E. M. Marzetti, O. R. Montana, A Orlandini, A Prado, R. F. Rabinovich, H Ramos, A. S. Sanchez, P. O. Schygiel, O. H. Selva, M. L. Vico, D. R. Vogel, C. J. Zaidman, J V Amerena, G M Aroney, D Ashby, M A Barlow, P T Boyd, D Colquhoun, P Cooke, D. S. Coulshed, D. B. Cross, M J E Davis, D Eccleston, D S Eccleston, P Garrahy, W Heddle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

194 Citations (Scopus)


BACKGROUND: The risk of cardiovascular events among patients with atrial fibrillation is high. We evaluated whether irbesartan, an angiotensin-receptor blocker, would reduce this risk. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with a history of risk factors for stroke and a systolic blood pressure of at least 110 mm Hg to receive either irbesartan at a target dose of 300 mg once daily or double-blind placebo. These patients were already enrolled in one of two trials (of clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone or versus oral anti-coagulants). The first coprimary outcome was stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from vascular causes; the second was this composite outcome plus hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: A total of 9016 patients were enrolled and followed for a mean of 4.1 years. The mean reduction in systolic blood pressure was 2.9 mm Hg greater in the irbesartan group than in the placebo group, and the mean reduction in diastolic blood pressure was 1.9 mm Hg greater. The first coprimary outcome occurred at a rate of 5.4% per 100 person-years in both groups (hazard ratio with irbesartan, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.08; P = 0.85). The second coprimary outcome occurred at a rate of 7.3% per 100 person-years among patients receiving irbesartan and 7.7% per 100 person-years among patients receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.02; P = 0.12). The rates of first hospitalization for heart failure (a pre-specified secondary outcome) were 2.7% per 100 person-years among patients receiving irbesartan and 3.2% per 100 person-years among patients receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.98). Among patients who were in sinus rhythm at baseline, there was no benefit of irbesartan in preventing hospitalization for atrial fibrillation or atrial fibrillation recorded on 12-lead electrocardiography, nor was there a benefit in a subgroup that underwent transtelephonic monitoring. More patients in the irbesartan group than in the placebo group had symptomatic hypotension (127 vs. 64) and renal dysfunction (43 vs. 24). CONCLUSIONS: Irbesartan did not reduce cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sanofi-Aventis; number, NCT00249795.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)928-938
Number of pages11
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 10 Mar 2011


Dive into the research topics of 'Irbesartan in patients with atrial fibrillation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this