Abstract
Isaiah Berlin’s account of freedom is more useful for feminists than is generally recognized, especially when seen in the context of his value pluralism. Focusing on the work of Nancy Hirschmann and Sharon Krause, I argue, first, that Berlin’s concept of negative liberty can be used to resist patriarchy when his notion of the ‘conditions’ of negative liberty is taken into account. Second, positive liberty is also useful to feminists, but Berlin does not, as some feminist (and other) writers suppose, simply reject positive liberty; on the contrary, he sees it as a fundamental human value of great importance. Third, Berlin’s value pluralism makes a crucial contribution. It explains why he distinguishes negative liberty from its conditions and why he does not reject positive liberty as a value. It also explains how feminists can see the value in both negative and positive liberty without trying, paradoxically, to fit them both into a single concept. Further, my liberal-pluralist extension of Berlin’s pluralism locates all these insights within a complex but coherent political outlook which provides a sympathetic resource for feminism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 275-288 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Society |
Volume | 61 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 12 Apr 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2024 |
Keywords
- Catherine MacKinnon
- Feminism
- Isaiah Berlin
- Liberalism
- Liberty
- Nancy Hirschmann
- Sharon R Krause
- Value pluralism