It's Not Just What You Have, but Who You Know: Networks, Social Proximity to Elites, and Voting in State and Local Elections

Matthew Pietryka, Donald DeBats

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Individual-level studies of electoral turnout and vote choice have focused largely on personal attributes as explanatory variables. We argue that scholars should also consider the social network in which individuals are embedded, which may influence voting through variation in individuals' social proximity to elites. Our analysis rests on newly discovered historical records revealing the individual votes of all electors in the 1859 statewide elections in Alexandria, Virginia and the 1874 municipal elections in Newport, Kentucky, paired with archival work identifying the social relations of the cities' populations. We also replicate our core findings using survey data from a modern municipal election. We show that individuals more socially proximate to elites turn out at a higher rate and individuals more socially proximate to a given political party's elites vote disproportionately for that party. These results suggest an overlooked social component of voting and provide a rare nineteenth-century test of modern voting theories.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)360-378
    Number of pages19
    JournalAMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW
    Volume111
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'It's Not Just What You Have, but Who You Know: Networks, Social Proximity to Elites, and Voting in State and Local Elections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this