TY - JOUR
T1 - Judicial Demeanor: Oral Argument in the High Court of Australia
AU - Tutton, Jordan
AU - Mack, Kathleen
AU - Roach Anleu, Sharyn
PY - 2018/7/3
Y1 - 2018/7/3
N2 - An important way judicial authority is expressed is through in-court demeanor. Original empirical research investigates the demeanor of the judges of the High Court of Australia during oral argument by using a fine-grained analysis of transcripts and audio visual recordings. This research finds that the judges present an impersonal or detached demeanor, consistent with formal or abstract norms governing the judicial role. The slight departures from a detached demeanor observed suggest ways judicial presentation balances formal requirements of a detached demeanor with some human display of individual behaviors in a particular court context.
AB - An important way judicial authority is expressed is through in-court demeanor. Original empirical research investigates the demeanor of the judges of the High Court of Australia during oral argument by using a fine-grained analysis of transcripts and audio visual recordings. This research finds that the judges present an impersonal or detached demeanor, consistent with formal or abstract norms governing the judicial role. The slight departures from a detached demeanor observed suggest ways judicial presentation balances formal requirements of a detached demeanor with some human display of individual behaviors in a particular court context.
KW - appellate courts
KW - judges
KW - judicial demeanor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047416967&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/LP0210306
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/DP0665198
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/DP1096888
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/DP150103663
U2 - 10.1080/0098261X.2018.1463185
DO - 10.1080/0098261X.2018.1463185
M3 - Article
VL - 39
SP - 273
EP - 299
JO - Justice System Journal
JF - Justice System Journal
SN - 0098-261X
IS - 3
ER -