Judicial Humour and Inter-Professional Relations in the Courtroom

Sharyn Roach Anleu, Kathy Mack

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Conventional understandings of the judicial role emphasise impersonality, leaving little space for humour. However, the courtroom is a workplace where different professions come together, each highly dependent on the other. Solicitors, barristers and police prosecutors (in lower courts) provide information or undertake tasks necessary for judicial decision-making. Although judicial officers in both higher and lower courts have considerable formal legal authority, their direct supervisory power over the out-of-court work of these other professionals is limited. This observational study of Australian lower courts finds that one strategy magistrates adopt to bridge this gap is humour. A magistrate’s practical use of humour can help judicial officers meet organisational challenges such as time management, while the normative use of humour delineates inter-professional roles and obligations.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJudges, Judging and Humour
EditorsJessica Milner Davis , Sharyn Roach Anleu
Place of PublicationCham, Switzerland
PublisherPalgrave
Chapter5
Pages141-178
Number of pages38
ISBN (Electronic)9783319767383
ISBN (Print)9783319767376
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Courts
  • courtroom workgroup
  • Judges
  • judicial humour
  • humour and professions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Judicial Humour and Inter-Professional Relations in the Courtroom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Judges, Judging and Humour

    Milner Davis, J. & Roach Anleu, S., 2018, First ed. Switzerland: Palgrave. 335 p.

    Research output: Book/ReportAnthologypeer-review

Cite this