Abstract
Purpose: This paper investigates Jean Baudrillard’s “Double Refusal,” and probes what happens in the space between leadership and followership. The paper tracks the trajectory from leadership bingo to followership bingo as a strategy to mitigate the double refusal.
Design/methodology/approach: This is a theoretical paper, and presented in an essay format.
Findings: It is important to assess the consequences of the Baudrillian “Double Refusal” – the refusal to lead and the refusal to be led – and the consequences of this double refusal for the language and behaviour of leaders and followers.
Research limitations/implications: This is a reflexive essay. A provocations piece.
Practical implications: A consciousness of the social semiotics of leadership failure and the benefits of a follower-centric organizational culture.
Originality/value: I confirm that the application of Jean Baudrillard theory of the double refusal has benefits to leadership theory. This is a rare and promising intervention.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 133-140 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Leadership Education |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 26 Jun 2026 |
Keywords
- Leadership
- Followership
- Jean Baudrillard
- Double refusal
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Leadership Bingo: Baudrillard’s double refusal and a future for followership'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver