Lessons from conducting mixed methods research prevalence studies: recommendations for overcoming the challenges of inconsistent reporting

Jennifer Kosiol; Ingy Shafei; Maryam Sassoli; Roslyn  Cameron; Anneke Fitzgerald

Lessons from conducting mixed methods research prevalence studies: recommendations for overcoming the challenges of inconsistent reporting

Jennifer Kosiol, Ingy Shafei, Maryam Sassoli, Roslyn Cameron, Anneke Fitzgerald

College of Business, Government and Law

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

This chapter introduces mixed methods research (MMR) prevalence studies, their value to the MMR scholarly community and disciplines, and the challenges associated with undertaking such studies. MMR prevalence studies provide an indication as to the frequency at which MMR studies are being reported within discipline-specific literature which, over time, demonstrates the utility and acceptance of MMR within a discipline. However, as MMR studies are increasingly being reported, it is also notable that there are many inconsistencies in reporting (Skivington et al., 2021). To better understand how to overcome these inconsistencies and
challenges, we draw upon an MMR prevalence study we conducted in the field of health management...

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Handbook of Mixed Methods Research in Business and Management
Editors	Roslyn Cameron , Xanthe Golenko
Place of Publication	Cheltenham, UK
Publisher	Edward Elgar Publishing
Chapter	14
Pages	207-222
Number of pages	16
ISBN (Electronic)	978 1 80088 795 4
ISBN (Print)	978 1 80088 794 7
Publication status	Published - 2023

Keywords

Mixed methods research
Mixed methods research (MMR) prevalence studies
Academic research

Cite this

@inbook{ec6c74df06334ee6981bd3da112d3c46,

title = "Lessons from conducting mixed methods research prevalence studies: recommendations for overcoming the challenges of inconsistent reporting",

abstract = "This chapter introduces mixed methods research (MMR) prevalence studies, their value to the MMR scholarly community and disciplines, and the challenges associated with undertaking such studies. MMR prevalence studies provide an indication as to the frequency at which MMR studies are being reported within discipline-specific literature which, over time, demonstrates the utility and acceptance of MMR within a discipline. However, as MMR studies are increasingly being reported, it is also notable that there are many inconsistencies in reporting (Skivington et al., 2021). To better understand how to overcome these inconsistencies andchallenges, we draw upon an MMR prevalence study we conducted in the field of health management...",

keywords = "Mixed methods research, Mixed methods research (MMR) prevalence studies, Academic research",

author = "Jennifer Kosiol and Ingy Shafei and Maryam Sassoli and Roslyn Cameron and Anneke Fitzgerald",

year = "2023",

language = "English",

isbn = "978 1 80088 794 7",

pages = "207--222",

editor = "{Cameron }, {Roslyn } and Xanthe Golenko",

booktitle = "Handbook of Mixed Methods Research in Business and Management",

publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",

}

Lessons from conducting mixed methods research prevalence studies: recommendations for overcoming the challenges of inconsistent reporting. / Kosiol, Jennifer; Shafei, Ingy; Sassoli, Maryam et al.
Handbook of Mixed Methods Research in Business and Management. ed. / Roslyn Cameron ; Xanthe Golenko. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023. p. 207-222.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Lessons from conducting mixed methods research prevalence studies

T2 - recommendations for overcoming the challenges of inconsistent reporting

AU - Kosiol, Jennifer

AU - Shafei, Ingy

AU - Sassoli, Maryam

AU - Cameron, Roslyn

AU - Fitzgerald, Anneke

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - This chapter introduces mixed methods research (MMR) prevalence studies, their value to the MMR scholarly community and disciplines, and the challenges associated with undertaking such studies. MMR prevalence studies provide an indication as to the frequency at which MMR studies are being reported within discipline-specific literature which, over time, demonstrates the utility and acceptance of MMR within a discipline. However, as MMR studies are increasingly being reported, it is also notable that there are many inconsistencies in reporting (Skivington et al., 2021). To better understand how to overcome these inconsistencies andchallenges, we draw upon an MMR prevalence study we conducted in the field of health management...

AB - This chapter introduces mixed methods research (MMR) prevalence studies, their value to the MMR scholarly community and disciplines, and the challenges associated with undertaking such studies. MMR prevalence studies provide an indication as to the frequency at which MMR studies are being reported within discipline-specific literature which, over time, demonstrates the utility and acceptance of MMR within a discipline. However, as MMR studies are increasingly being reported, it is also notable that there are many inconsistencies in reporting (Skivington et al., 2021). To better understand how to overcome these inconsistencies andchallenges, we draw upon an MMR prevalence study we conducted in the field of health management...

KW - Mixed methods research

KW - Mixed methods research (MMR) prevalence studies

KW - Academic research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178985407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978 1 80088 794 7

SP - 207

EP - 222

BT - Handbook of Mixed Methods Research in Business and Management

A2 - Cameron , Roslyn

A2 - Golenko, Xanthe

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing

CY - Cheltenham, UK

ER -

Lessons from conducting mixed methods research prevalence studies: recommendations for overcoming the challenges of inconsistent reporting

Abstract

Keywords

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this