Letter to the Editor: On moving average and internal quality control

Chun Yee Lim, Corey Markus, Rui Zhen Tan, Tze Ping Loh

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

In a recent study [1], Bayat et al. raised concerns with the simulation of our approach for comparing moving average (MA) approaches for quality control (QC) with traditional ('Westgard') QC practices [2]. They contended that it was odd to simulate 10–20 QC measurements per evaluation event while having only 1 to 2 measurements for traditional QC. We believe this is a misunderstanding of our methods and the concept of block size, which is a relatively new application to quality control.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-34
Number of pages3
JournalClinical Biochemistry
Volume103
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2022

Keywords

  • moving average
  • internal quality control
  • academic laboratories

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Letter to the Editor: On moving average and internal quality control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this