Littering dynamics in a coastal industrial setting: The influence of non-resident populations

Marnie L. Campbell, Chloe Paterson de Heer, Amber Kinslow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined if there is truth to the preconceptions that non-resident workers (including FIFO/DIDO's) detract from communities. We used marine debris to test this, specifically focussing on littering behaviour and evidence of awareness of local environmental programs that focus on marine debris. Littering was most common at recreational areas, then beaches and whilst boating. Twenty-five percent of respondents that admit to littering, reported no associated guilt with their actions. Younger respondents litter more frequently. Thus, non-resident workers litter at the same rate as permanent residents, visitors and tourists in this region, within this study. Few respondents are aware of the environmental programs that operate in their local region. Awareness was influenced by a respondent's residency (non-residents are less aware), age, and level of education. To address this failure we recommend that industries, that use non-resident workers, should develop inductions that expose new workers to the environmental programs in their region.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-185
Number of pages7
JournalMarine Pollution Bulletin
Volume80
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • DIDO
  • FIFO
  • Littering behaviour
  • Marine debris
  • Plastics
  • Social licence to operate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Littering dynamics in a coastal industrial setting: The influence of non-resident populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this