LLM-assisted medical documentation: efficacy, errors, and ethical considerations in ophthalmology

Shrirajh Satheakeerthy, Daniel Jesudason, James Pietris, Stephen Bacchi, Weng Onn Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been recognised as a potentially transformative tool in modern medicine, with the ability to significantly enhance workflow efficiency [1]. Implementing AI to automate the writing of clinic notes is one area in which such benefit may be realised. Large language models (LLMs) are a subset of AI trained on vast amounts of textual data and have shown great promise in understanding and generating human-like text [2]. In ophthalmology, the integration of LLM-driven autocompletion functions introduces the potential for AI-generated management plans to be created. It is therefore important to consider their efficacy, reliability and potential to influence overall patient outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1440-1442
Number of pages3
JournalEye (Basingstoke)
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence (AI)
  • LLMs
  • LLM-assisted medical documentation
  • clinic notes
  • textual data
  • medical documentation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'LLM-assisted medical documentation: efficacy, errors, and ethical considerations in ophthalmology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this