Long term effects of antenatal betamethasone on lung function: 30 Year follow up of a randomised controlled trial

S. R. Dalziel, H. H. Rea, N. K. Walker, V. Parag, C. Mantell, A. Rodgers, J. E. Harding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Antenatal betamethasone is routinely used for the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. However, little is known of the long term effects of exposure to antenatal betamethasone on lung function in adulthood. Methods: Five hundred and thirty four 30 year olds whose mothers had participated in the first and largest randomised controlled trial of antenatal betamethasone were followed. Lung function was assessed by portable spirometric testing. The prevalence of asthma symptoms was assessed using the European Community Respiratory Health Survey questionnaire. Results: Fifty (20%) betamethasone exposed and 53 (19%) placebo exposed participants met the criteria for current asthma (relative risk 0.98 (95% Cl 0.74 to 1.30), p = 0.89). 181 betamethasone exposed and 202 placebo exposed participants had acceptable spirometric data. There were no differences in lung function between betamethasone and placebo exposed groups (mean (SD) forced vital capacity in the betamethasone and placebo groups 105.9 (12.0) v 106.6 (12.6)% predicted, difference =-0.7 (95% Cl -3.2 to 1.8), p = 0.59; mean (SD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second in the betamethasone and placebo groups 98.9 (13.4) v 98.5 (13.6)% predicted, difference = 0.3 (95% Cl -2.4 to 3.1, p = 0.80)). Conclusions: Antenatal exposure to a single course of betamethasone does not alter lung function or the prevalence of wheeze and asthma at age 30.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)678-683
Number of pages6
JournalThorax
Volume61
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long term effects of antenatal betamethasone on lung function: 30 Year follow up of a randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this