Looking back and planning ahead: the tobacco endgame and controlling tobacco industry interference in Aotearoa New Zealand

Janet Hoek, Andrew Waa, Richard Edwards, Melissa-Jade Gregan, Anna Graham-DeMello

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Smoking causes at least 16 different cancers and has resulted in persistent health inequities. Aotearoa New Zealand was initially a Tupeka Kore (Tobacco Free) nation and Māori leaders have led calls for measures that would end the harms smoking imposes. Their vision inspired a national movement and later saw a new law introduced that mandated denicotinisation, reduced the supply of tobacco, and introduced a smokefree generation. The National-led coalition Government repealed these measures, drawing on arguments often advanced by tobacco companies. Using the Policy Dystopia Model, we analysed tobacco industry narratives and reviewed politicians’ use of industry arguments. We found coalition Government members drew on prohibition and illicit trade arguments, which segued into public safety concerns, despite weak evidence for these claims. To protect innovative public health policies, we argue for stronger lobbying regulation to reduce tobacco companies’ ability to interfere with policy making and improve compliance with Article 5.3 of the World Health Organization’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Stronger regulation of lobbying would protect critical public health policies that could profoundly reduce cancer rates from commercial interests.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1190-1208
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Volume55
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • coroporate lobbying‌
  • smokefree policy
  • tobacco endgame
  • Tobacco industry interference
  • ‌Policy Dystopia Model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Looking back and planning ahead: the tobacco endgame and controlling tobacco industry interference in Aotearoa New Zealand'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this